Historians and history commentators are not the same.

There’s a difference between a historian and history commentary or commentator. Most people mistaken the two to be the same when they aren’t. A historian records unbiased facts by interviewing eye witnesses and in some cases they were an eyewitness. They records the actual facts and do not detour from them. The record it just as it is occurred. If anyone said or did something horrible. They records it. They don’t clean it up or dress it up.

It’s the history commentary or commentator are who make it more pliable and pleasant sounding or sometime even distort accounts for the public but often they wasn’t a witness nor interviewed any witnesses so they too must rely on what the historians wrote.

A history commentary or commentator do not always rely solely on facts. They often adds or subtract based upon their personal feelings or cultural connections and are often quite biased in their account of the event. But too often their accounts are what is taken as the actual accounts.

Perhaps one of the most famous historian is the Jewish-Roman historian, Flavius Josephus. In some text you find his name written Josephus Flavius. He is who recorded the death of “James the Just,” who was a brother of Jesus called Christ. Whereas it is often believed in many religious sect that Jesus had no siblings. He wasn’t writing from a religious standpoint but as a witness who was recording the hostile climate of the first century. He also wrote about many other things which is how we know or at least believed they happened.

In the days before more lenient rulerships of nations, poets and writers often served as historians by telling the events in a subdue manner making it seems as a fictional story. Sure, they added cyclops gods, goddesses, hero’s epic struggles, and minotaurs to make the story more exciting but they were often recording history so that future generations would know what happened. And know why things are the way they are in their own era.

The Egyptian viziers were the sealers of the tombs of the pharaohs often wrote what the ruler was ‘really‘ like after the family left and before the tomb was sealed.

Another famous historian is Homer. The author of the Iliad. He wrote about the lost Egyptian city of Thonis, (Heracleion) was the Greek name which recently was found under the sea. He also wrote about Atlantis. So, if Thonis actual once existed, then perhaps so did Atlantis.

History commentaries or commentators have always been viewed more favorable by the public than historians. Why? Because they say what the public wish to hear whereas a historian will not. Rulers and kings have always detested true historians.

About unholypursuit

A. White, an award winning former librarian, who is also a long time member of Romantic Time and Publisher's Weekly. A. White has been writing for over fifteen years. She took classes in creative writing in college, specializing in ancient myths and legends. and later at a local community center while living in Chicago. In college she won the national contest to verbally list every country in the world, it's capital and ingenious language. Her works are mainly horror, fantasy, extreme, and sci-fi as well as, as some may says, "the truly strange predicament and puzzling." Books that I've written are "Clash with the Immortals, and eleven others which are part of the "Unholy Pursuit saga,". She has been working on the Chronicles since 2007. She wished to complete them all before introducing them to public so the readers wouldn't have to for the continuation to be written. The ideas of the book come from classic literature such as whose work greatly influence the world world such as Homer, Sophocles, Herodotus, Euripides, Socrates, Hippocrates, Aristophanes, Plato, Aristotle and many more. The "Book of Enoch" influenced the usage of Azazael as a main character and love interest. I created the primary main character from the Chronicle of Saints. I wanted to show them as real flesh and blood with thoughts, desires and yearning as any human. Not as they are so often depicted. So I created one of my own to show her as a real human that everyone can relate to.
This entry was posted in futuristic, history, writers, writings and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Historians and history commentators are not the same.

  1. Pingback: Historians/History Commentators: Not The Same. – The Militant Negro™

  2. Lisa Warner says:

    Alma, people don’t want to read, see, nor hear the truth about anything. Everyone want all things wrapped in a neat pretty package. If a catastrophic event were to strike today most people would be dead by Monday morning. They would whine themselves to death.

    On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:40 PM, The Novel: UnHoly Pursuit: Devil on my Tra

    Liked by 1 person

      • Rendage says:

        Lady, I know you are a lady because I read your book. But I have to tell ya, you’re a great writer and post informative stuff. But you write above most people head. Most people are only interested in things like Kim Kardashian and other celebrities and how darn depressed everyone is. Maybe one day people’s brain will unfreeze and realize what a treasure people like you are.


  3. Kacosma says:

    Revised history is all the rave. Every thing has been so whitewashed that it’s hard to find the truth.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.